Ranking of Austrian Online CSR Reports

Results 2019: Spar - Nachhaltigkeitsbericht 2017

For the ranking in each category (Strategic Approach, Open Information and User Orientation) click on the respective link below.

 RankScoreAverageBest
1. STRATEGIC APPROACH1530.111.942.8
a. Were the material aspects identified according to the criteria of the GRI standard?48.66.59.4
b. Does the company take responsibility for its impact along the entire value chain?185.06.09.2
c. Does the corporate strategy include a management approach to all material topics?146.46.09.0
d. Are both harm reduction strategies and maximization of benefits pursued?116.55.69.6
e. Have appropriate structures and processes for sustainability management been set up and sufficiently presented in the report?163.64.69.1
2. OPEN INFORMATION1913.06.226.9
a. Does the report make clear and complete statements? (Key figures on all material topics, interpretation of development, definition/evaluation of goals)124.74.89.2
b. Is the report balanced? (positive / negative developments, solved / unresolved problems, etc.)154.85.08.8
c. Are internal and external stakeholders appropriately involved and are the relevant structures and processes disclosed?203.45.19.1
3. USER ORIENTATION1111.14.017.0
a. Is the report clearly structured according to the material topics?44.12.84.7
b. Is the text clear and precise, easy to understand and read?43.93.04.4
c. Is the visualization appealing and does it support the understanding of the content?171.82.34.6
d. Is the report user-friendly and are online features sufficiently utilized? (Target group specific approach, optional information, links, timeliness, interactivity etc.)141.41.74.5
TOTAL RANK & SCORE1754.253.686.2
Spar

Recommendations:

(provided by students, how the company should improve its report)

Reassess their understanding of key areas such as materiality, impact along the value chain etc. more thoroughly and make sure that the next report will not focus on core business areas (customers & products) – which would greatly enhance credibility and transparency of the report and make it less of a PR product.

A reassessment of relevant materiality issues would follow, making them more impact-oriented.

A visualisation of progress towards goals would also help.

Although all goals are described, there is no prioritization. For me as a reader is not understandable, which has the highest importance for the company. Here, for example, a tabular presentation of the goals would be very good.

Spar should also provide an English version of their sustainability report in order to make it available for everyone to read.

The PDF version of the sustainability report is not very appealing. It does not make use of all the opportunities media offers nowadays. This is an important aspect as it would enhance the user-friendliness. For SPAR this is essential because its target group is very diverse (customers, investors etc.). Therefore, it would attract more attention and elevate the level of comprehension if SPAR put extra effort into the design aspect and work on an interactive online version of the report.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply